How a Company’s Business Model Shapes Your Work As A Designer

Observation: Companies with good business models are often good places to work. Companies with bad business models create pressure that flows down, and designers often get blamed for missed goals. The real issue is often the business model. Working at places like Klarna, Gorillas, Getir, Bird Scooters, Buzzfeed, Vice, HelloFresh, Blue Apron, Bolt, Quibi, Juicero, or Theranos, design excellence can’t fix a broken model. The goal of a business is to make money. Failure leads to pressure, blame, and a toxic culture.

Understanding this is critical for designers. They connect business goals and user needs. The business model’s health affects their ability to design effectively and have a good career. A weak model means pressure, impossible goals, burnout, and misdirected blame.

This report examines this relationship through nine key questions. It covers how models shape work, why designers are scapegoats, the limits of design, identifying healthy vs. unhealthy models, VC pressure, problematic model types, evaluating companies, and navigating careers after failures. The goal is to give designers practical insights to make informed decisions for their careers and well-being.

How Does A Bad Business Model Impact a Product Designer’s Daily Work and Environment?

A company’s business model—its strategy for revenue and operations—impacts everything for a product designer: daily work, resources, pressure, and environment. It determines budgets, timelines, culture, and how much design is valued.

Impact on Resources, Priorities, and Timelines

A profitable or sustainable model usually means better resource allocation. For designers: access to software, user research budgets, sufficient staff, and realistic timelines.¹ This supports quality design work. Designers can research user needs, iterate, and collaborate effectively.

Conversely, a struggling model—high cash burn, no clear path to profit, like early Gorillas ² or Bird Scooters ³—harms design teams. These VC-fueled companies might prioritize hyper-growth over financial health, creating scarcity and crisis. Designers face outdated tools, no research budget, and pressure to meet aggressive, shifting deadlines.² Unprofitable segments or losses lead to cost-cutting, often hitting design.⁵ This means doing more with less, compromising quality.

How a company makes money dictates resources. A flawed model misallocates resources, starving design research for short-term, reactive measures.⁵ A business model defines value creation and capture.⁷ If flawed (bad cost structure, wrong market assumptions), it struggles to capture value, leading to scarcity. Leadership prioritizes quick financial returns. Deep user research or foundational design, with longer ROI, gets cut for faster feature shipping or sales efforts. Gorillas’ rapid expansion likely sacrificed sustainable design practices for market share.²

Impact on Company Culture and Pressure Levels

Business model health links directly to culture. Financial stability allows leadership to build a positive, innovative environment.⁸ Stress is manageable, tied to projects, not survival.

If the model fails (low revenue, missed investor targets, unsustainable), pressure from the top increases. This “trickle-down” pressure creates “crisis mode,” unrealistic goals, and a blame culture where mistakes are punished.⁹ Micromanagement increases. This leads to high stress, burnout, and turnover.² In extreme cases, it fosters a “toxic” environment with disrespect or unethical practices driven by desperation.¹² Klarna, with its rapid growth and “buy now, pay later” model scrutiny, reportedly had periods of chaotic, high-pressure environments linked to expansion and restructuring.¹⁴

Stability from a robust model affects psychological safety. Unpredictable revenue or existential threats erode safety, stifling creativity, risk-taking, and honest feedback—all vital for design.⁸ A failing model creates fear: layoffs, cancellations, blame. Designers avoid innovation, default to “safe” designs, or just execute directives. Bird Scooters’ “culture of doubt” from “erratic decision-making” amid financial struggles shows how model instability poisons the environment.³

Impact on the Design Process, Autonomy, and the Value of Design

Companies with healthy models and mature product development often see design as strategic. Designers get autonomy, are included in strategy, and their expertise is respected.²⁰

In companies with flawed models, design’s role diminishes. It becomes executional (“make it look good”) or a cost center. Or, paradoxically, a last resort to fix business problems superficially. User-centered decisions get overridden by short-term financial targets or panic. Klarna’s design leader noted the challenge of “promoting the design…to follow the best practices” even during growth.²³ This is harder with an unstable model. Cost-cutting pressures, like Klarna using AI for images/copywriting, can reshape design roles and raise concerns about job security or devaluing human skills.²⁴

A company’s business model is the foundation for operations, culture, and employee experience. A healthy model enables meaningful design work, creativity, and growth. A flawed model creates negative consequences: resource scarcity, pressure, toxicity, ethical compromises, making it hard for designers to succeed.

Why Do Designers Often Take the Fall for a Company’s Flawed Business Model?

When a company fails to meet goals due to a flawed business model, product designers often take the blame. This happens for several reasons: the visibility of design, leadership’s misunderstanding of root causes, and the difficulty of fixing a failing business strategy.

Visibility and Tangibility of Design

Product design (UI, UX, features) is the company’s most visible output. If users don’t adopt, conversion is low, or retention is poor, it’s simpler to blame design (“not user-friendly,” “looks bad,” “wrong features”) than complex, hidden business model problems.²⁷ Leaders unfamiliar with design or business model mechanics may blame what they see. The product is an easy scapegoat because its perceived flaws are apparent, unlike an abstract failing revenue strategy.

Misunderstanding or Misattribution of Root Cause

Symptoms of a failing model often appear in user interaction. If a product is priced too high due to an inefficient model (like Juicero ²⁸), users might abandon it for poor value. This is a business model failure, but feedback might be “product isn’t worth it,” and designers are told to “improve design” to justify the price. This misattributes the problem. If a model targets the wrong segment or solves a low-priority problem, the product will underperform. Designers meeting flawed requirements might be blamed for not understanding users, when the misunderstanding was strategic.²⁷

Designers as “Solvers” and Unrealistic Expectations

Designers are problem solvers. When a company faces threats from a failing model, there’s an expectation design can “design the way out.” This is often impossible. As noted initially, “no amount of Product Design excellence is going to fix that fundamentally broken business model.” Designers are pressured to iterate endlessly, add features, or overhaul visuals, hoping to reverse fortunes. Design operates within the model’s parameters; it can’t create a market, fix costs, or generate revenue if the value proposition is missing.

Designers are unlikely to fight back

Designers tend to be introvert people-pleasers who avoid conflict. They just wanna chill, do good work and be left alone otherwise. They often don’t have the verbal and social skills to effectively fight back. Even if they do, they often don’t have the aggression levels. The design teams also tend to be small. This makes them easy targets in a toxic corporate environment.

Limited Influence of Design on Core Business Strategy

Designers often aren’t involved in high-level business strategy formulation. They work within constraints set by the model, market, and value propositions.¹ If these foundations are flawed, designers optimize a broken system. When the product fails, execution (design/dev) gets blamed, not the flawed strategy.

Blaming designers is often a symptom of leadership failing to grasp or confront the root cause.²⁷ Admitting model flaws implies leadership misjudgment. Blaming design can feel less threatening. Design’s subjective nature (to outsiders) and harder-to-quantify short-term ROI make it a vulnerable target.

The iterative design process can be misunderstood in high-pressure environments. Design involves research and refinement.³⁴ Desperate companies want quick fixes, seeing this approach as slow. If iterations don’t fix underlying business problems (bad pricing, no demand), the design team gets blamed.

Can Excellent Product Design ever Save a Failing Business Model?

Design has strengths—improving UX, engagement, loyalty.²⁰ But it generally cannot rescue a business from fundamental flaws in profitability, market demand, or cost structure. Design influences these but rarely fixes them alone.

The Limitations of Design When the Business Model is Fundamentally Flawed

Design has limits against deep business model failures:

• Solving Non-Existent or Non-Valued Problems: Design can’t create demand if users don’t have the problem or won’t pay to solve it. Juicero’s expensive machine squeezed packets users found unnecessary and overpriced, especially when hand-squeezing worked.²⁸ Quibi offered quality short-form content, but its mobile-focused model faltered during COVID, and content didn’t justify the price against alternatives.³²
• Unsustainable Cost Structures: Great design can’t fix a business spending far more than it earns. “Growth-at-all-costs” startups like Gorillas ² show this.
• Incorrect Target Market or Insufficient Market Size: Design can’t expand a too-small market or make a product relevant to the wrong audience. Quibi targeting commuters during lockdown illustrates this mismatch.³²
• Misaligned Pricing and Value Proposition: A well-designed but overpriced product will struggle. Juicero’s $700 price plus pack costs was a barrier.²⁸
• Ineffective Distribution Channels: The best product fails if it can’t reach customers. Distribution is part of the business model, not just design.
• Fraudulent or Deceptive Practices: Excellent design might temporarily mask fraud (like Theranos ²⁵), but can’t prevent collapse when truth emerges.

Experts use phrases like “lipstick on a pig.” If the core idea is flawed, superficial improvements fail. Fisker said, “If design isn’t profitable, then it’s art” ³⁸—which is a bit ironic considering that his car business failed so horribly, but he’s correct nonetheless. Everything.design notes, “Great marketing can’t save a bad product or business model,” which applies to design too.⁴⁰ Failing to consider cost-effectiveness and manufacturing early is a common design mistake linked to bad models.⁴¹

Business model innovation can enhance design’s value, not just the other way around. Architecture firms productizing services or offering consulting leverage design expertise through model innovation.⁴²

Design Can Expose or Amplify Business Model Flaws

Rigorous design process (user research, validation) can reveal model flaws by testing assumptions about user needs and willingness to pay.

However, if a model is unethical, excellent design could make it more effective at harming users, creating ethical dilemmas.²⁰

Excellent design can create a temporary illusion of viability. A sleek product attracts initial users, press, investors.³⁷ But this is superficial if economics fail or value isn’t sustained. Users churn, investors lose confidence, the business falters.

Pressure for design to “save” a failing business often leads to bad design decisions. Desperate leadership pushes for feature bloat, diluting value.⁴¹ Designers might be pressured into “dark patterns”—manipulative interfaces—to boost short-term metrics, eroding trust and creating ethical issues.²⁰

Best outcomes occur when product design and business model design develop together.¹ Early designer involvement in strategy allows co-creation of viable, user-centered models. This proactive integration is better than retroactively fixing broken models with design changes. Design’s real power is helping build sound businesses from the start.

Green Flags: What Defines a ‘Healthy’ Business Model?

• Clear Value Proposition and Strong Product-Market Fit: Solves a real problem for a defined audience willing to pay.⁷
  • Implication: Design work is purposeful. User research is valued. Focus is on enhancing user value.
• Sustainable Profitability or a Credible Path to It: Generates profit or has a realistic plan. Not perpetually reliant on VC funding without a viable economic engine.⁴⁷
  • Implication: Job security, adequate design resources (tools, research, talent), less panic, long-term strategic projects.
• Deep-Rooted Customer-Centricity: Model built around serving customer needs ethically, not just short-term extraction.⁷ HelloFresh lists this as a core value.⁴⁸
  • Implication: Natural alignment with user-focused design. User advocacy supported. Research is critical input.
• Ethical Practices and Operational Transparency: Operates with integrity towards all stakeholders. Transparent communication. Fair treatment.²⁰
  • Implication: Psychological safety, innovation without fear, pride in work. Aligns with personal ethics. Ethical leadership linked to autonomy.²²
• Adaptability and a Culture of Innovation: Flexible model adapts to market changes. Fosters experimentation.²⁷
  • Implication: Opportunities for new challenges, skill learning, contribution to evolution. Reduces stagnation.
• Strong, Aligned, and Visionary Leadership: Clear vision, communicated effectively. Empowers teams. Understands and champions design’s strategic value.¹⁹
  • Implication: Clear direction, design initiatives supported, potential voice in strategy.
• Investment in Employees and a Positive Workplace Culture: Views employees as assets. Invests in growth, development, well-being. Cultivates positive, supportive, inclusive environment.⁸
  • Implication: Learning/mentorship opportunities, work-life balance, collaborative atmosphere.
• Commitment to Broader Sustainability (Environmental and Social): Incorporates environmental/social responsibility, seen as healthier and more resilient long-term.⁴³
  • Implication: Chance for positive impact work. Fosters responsible innovation culture.⁵⁹

Organizational health frameworks ¹⁹ emphasize clear strategy, alignment, empowered leadership, talent development, innovation culture, positive employee experience—all signs of a robust model. Healthy functioning includes emotional balance, empathy, integration.⁵⁴ Positive culture links to business success: better retention, less burnout, more innovation.⁸

A healthy model fosters psychological safety, crucial for design creativity.¹⁹ Financial stability avoids fear and uncertainty that stifle innovation.² Designers can take calculated risks.

Healthy models invest in “design maturity”—seeing design as strategic, integrated, valuing research, systems, career paths. Financially sound companies with long-term strategy ¹⁹ can make these investments. Struggling companies focus on short-term survival.¹

Red Flags: What Are the Signs of an ‘Unhealthy’ Business Model That Breeds a Toxic Work Environment?

• Unclear or Constantly Shifting Business Strategy/Revenue Model: Leadership can’t clearly explain how the company makes money, or strategy changes frequently without rationale.⁶²
  • Impact: Constant pivots, design rework, wasted effort, confusion about goals.
• Over-reliance on VC Funding without a Clear Path to Profitability (“Growth at All Costs”): Perpetual dependence on funding without a viable plan. Often a “growth at all costs” mentality.⁶⁴ Examples: early Gorillas ², Bird Scooters.³
  • Impact: Intense pressure for rapid features for growth metrics, often sacrificing quality/research. Boom-bust hiring/layoffs.
• High Employee Turnover (Especially Design, Product, Leadership): Revolving door is a symptom of problems.⁸ Examples: Klarna ¹⁵, Bird Scooters.³
  • Impact: Instability, loss of knowledge, increased workload, job insecurity fear.
• Pervasive Blame Culture vs. Problem-Solving Culture: Blaming individuals instead of finding root causes and learning. Hallmark of toxicity.
  • Impact: Fear of risk-taking, hiding mistakes, stifled innovation, toxic dynamics.⁹
• Poor Communication and Lack of Transparency from Leadership: Information hoarding, opaque decisions, bad news hidden or spun.¹²
  • Impact: Rumors, anxiety, hindered decision-making, distrust of leadership.
• Unrealistic Deadlines and Constant “Fire Drills”: Perpetual emergency state, impossible demands, shifting goals indicate poor planning, desperation.⁶²
  • Impact: Chronic stress, burnout, rushed work, no time for thoughtful design/research, declining well-being.²
• Product Decisions Driven by Panic or Short-Term Metrics: Features prioritized/killed based on immediate financial pressure, investor demands, whims, not user value or strategy.⁶⁸
  • Impact: Frustration, meaningless work, discarded designs. Pressure for features against user needs or design principles. Ethical dilemmas.
• Encouragement or Tolerance of Ethical Lapses or “Dark Patterns”: Pressure from failing model leads to manipulative design techniques for short-term targets.²⁰ Extreme example: Theranos.²⁵
  • Impact: Moral distress, reputational damage, contributing to harmful UX.
• Vague Job Descriptions or Disorganized Interview Processes: Inability to define role/metrics or chaotic interviews suggest internal disorganization.⁶²
  • Impact: Role ambiguity, overwork, misutilization.
• Overstated Revenue/Metrics or Hiding Problems: Inflating success or concealing problems (Bird revenue ⁴, Theranos tech failures ²⁵) means deceitful foundation.
  • Impact: Working on false premises, disillusionment, reputational damage by association.

Table 1: Red Flags of an Unhealthy Business Model for Product Designers

Red Flag Category	Specific Sign	Potential Impact on Designers
Financial Instability	Over-reliance on VC funding without clear path to profit; high cash burn	Pressure for rapid, unsustainable growth; resource scarcity; layoffs
	Unclear or constantly shifting revenue model	Constant product pivots; wasted design effort; confusion
	Overstated revenue or hidden financial problems	Working on false premises; eventual disillusionment; reputational risk
Leadership & Culture	Poor communication & lack of transparency from leadership	Anxiety; inability to make informed decisions; distrust
	Blame culture vs. problem-solving culture	Fear of risk-taking; reduced innovation; toxic team dynamics
	High employee turnover (especially leadership/design)	Instability; loss of knowledge; increased workload; job insecurity
	Disconnect between stated culture (e.g., playbooks) and lived reality	Erosion of trust; cynicism; hypocrisy perceived
Product Strategy & Process	Product decisions driven by panic/short-term metrics, not user needs	Frustration; meaningless work; design churn; ethical compromises
	Unrealistic deadlines & constant “fire drills”	Burnout; sloppy work; no time for thoughtful design; chronic stress
	Vague job descriptions or disorganized interview process	Role ambiguity; potential for overwork or misuse of skills
Ethics	Encouragement or tolerance of ethical lapses / “dark patterns”	Moral distress; reputational damage; contributing to harmful UX
	Fraudulent or fundamentally deceptive business premise (e.g., Theranos)	Extreme pressure to maintain facade; severe ethical compromise; legal risks

Unhealthy models often result from founder inexperience, intense competition forcing risks ⁷⁰, or VC pressure for rapid, sometimes unsustainable, growth.⁶⁸ These factors push models and cultures into unhealthy territory.⁴⁶

A common issue is the disconnect between “stated culture” (on career pages, like Bolt’s “Conscious Culture” ⁷⁵) and “lived culture” (seen in reviews, turnover, like Bolt’s D+ rating ⁷⁶ or Klarna reviews ¹⁴). This gap breeds cynicism and distrust. HelloFresh promotes positive values ⁴⁸, but some reviews mention work-life balance issues.⁷⁸

“Unhealthy” isn’t always “unprofitable” short-term, especially for VC-backed startups. High cash burn and rapid growth can coexist with unhealthy, high-pressure culture. This stems from model unsustainability and the need to chase funding or growth targets. The “growth at all costs” model ⁶⁴ masks flaws while creating stress, long hours, focus on vanity metrics, leading to burnout and toxicity, even if appearing “successful” externally.

How Does Venture Capital’s Pressure for Rapid Growth Shape the Demands on Product Design Teams?

Venture capital provides essential funding for startups but comes with pressure for rapid growth and high returns quickly. This “VC squeeze” shapes startup culture and puts specific demands on teams, including product design.

The Nature of Venture Capital and Its Expectations

VCs invest in high-risk/high-potential startups expecting large returns via IPO or acquisition, usually in 5-10 years.⁶⁸ They prioritize rapid scaling and market dominance.⁶⁸ VCs often take board seats and influence strategy to meet growth goals.⁶⁸

Impact on Startup Culture

VC funding often creates a distinct culture:

• “Growth at All Costs” Mentality: Dominant ethos. Growth metrics (user acquisition, market share) can overshadow profitability, sustainability, quality, or well-being.⁶⁴ Focus is on getting big, fast.
• Fast-Paced, High-Intensity Environment: Relentless urgency to meet investor expectations and milestones. Exciting for some, stressful for others.⁶⁶ Blitzscaling’s “embrace chaos” rule reflects this.⁶⁶
• Potential for “Bad” Management Practices: Rush to scale can neglect good management (onboarding, mentorship, development) for speed.⁶⁶ Leads to lack of support, burnout.
• Risk of Premature Scaling: Pushing expansion before validating product-market fit or stable operations leads to inefficiency, failure risk.⁷¹
• Influence on Company Values and Ethics: Pressure for quick returns can lead to ethical compromises if not managed by strong leadership. Short-term gains prioritized over long-term trust or impact.⁶⁸

Demands on Product Design Teams

Design teams face unique pressures:

• Focus on Growth-Hacking Features: Design efforts skewed towards features for rapid acquisition/engagement, sometimes at expense of core usability, design systems, or long-term value.⁷¹
• Rapid Iteration and Extremely Short Deadlines: Immense pressure to design, prototype, test, ship quickly. Little time for deep research, exploration, refinement.⁶⁶ “Launch a product that embarrasses you” mentality prioritizes speed over perfection.⁶⁶
• Data-Driven (Often Metric-Obsessed) Design: Data is valuable, but can become obsession with narrow growth metrics. Risk of optimizing for local maxima (clicks) over holistic UX or strategic goals.
• Increased Workload and High Potential for Burnout: Constant demand for features, rapid iterations, fast pace lead to long hours, high stress, burnout risk.¹²
• Reduced Design Autonomy: Strategic design decisions heavily influenced or dictated by growth targets set under investor pressure. VC influence trickles down.⁶⁸ User-centric recommendations deprioritized if not aligned with immediate growth.
• Pressure to “Move Fast and Break Things”: Philosophy encourages speed over stability/quality. Can deprioritize design systems, usability testing, accessibility, leading to design debt, user frustration.⁶⁴

Examples like Klarna, Gorillas, Getir, Bird, Bolt, Quibi, Juicero were heavily VC-backed and showed these pressures. Gorillas’ hyper-growth and cash burn led to reports of bad management and pressure.² Bird’s aggressive growth linked to high turnover, erratic decisions.³ Quibi failed despite huge funding due to flawed model and leadership decisions under investment spotlight.³²

VC pressure creates misalignment between long-term user value and short-term growth metrics. Design teams are caught between championing users and implementing features for investor targets.⁶⁸

The “fail fast” mentality, meant for learning, can become chaotic launching of bad ideas under pressure, just to show activity.⁶⁶ If no real learning or resources follow, designers feel devalued, working in a “feature factory.”

VC industry homogeneity (herd mentality, pattern-matching) ⁷² can impose similar pressures across portfolio companies, stifling diverse design approaches and pushing convergence on growth tactics, regardless of fit for specific product/market/users. This limits creative potential, prioritizes investor appeal over unique user value.

Which Business Models Often Spell Trouble for Designers?

“Growth-at-all-Costs” / Blitzscaling Models:

• Characteristics: Prioritize rapid scaling, user acquisition over profitability, efficiency, quality, well-being. Heavy VC reliance.⁶⁴
• Impact: Intense pressure for speed/output. Focus on acquisition features. Premature/flawed product launches. Design quality suffers. Ethical boundaries pushed. Burnout risk.⁶⁶
• Examples: Gorillas, Getir, Bird (early phases).²

Business Models with Unclear or Unsustainable Revenue Streams:

• Characteristics: No reliable/scalable way to make money. Over-reliance on ads with declining rates, or models needing unrealistic scale for profit.
• Impact: Constant product pivots searching for revenue. Features designed then scrapped if no immediate monetization. Pressure for monetizing features detrimental to UX.
• Examples: Buzzfeed, Vice (historically ad-dependent, leading to re-strategizing, layoffs).⁸¹

Overly Complex or “Solution Looking for a Problem” Models:

• Characteristics: Technologically novel but solve no real user need, or solution is too complex/expensive. Driven by tech fascination, not user/market understanding.
• Impact: Designers struggle to create clear value prop. Complexity confuses users. Pressure to justify complexity/price via design, or work on unwanted features.
• Examples: Juicero (over-engineered, expensive).²⁸ Quibi (mobile-first model misjudged market/use case).³²

Marketplace Platforms with Imbalanced Incentives or Intense Competition:

• Characteristics: Two-sided markets (buyers/sellers, etc.). Balancing needs/incentives is hard. Intense competition leads to price wars, race to bottom, precarity for one side (gig workers).⁸⁸
• Impact: Pressure to design features favoring one side, creating poor experience for other. Constant iteration to fight churn/multi-homing. Ethical concerns if design facilitates exploitation (gig worker insecurity ⁸⁸).
• Examples: Ride-sharing, food delivery (Gorillas, Getir).

Subscription Models with Inherently High Churn or Low Perceived Ongoing Value:

• Characteristics: Hard to show consistent value, leading to high churn. High acquisition costs, unsustainable if retention poor.⁹⁴
• Impact: Design focus shifts to retention. Pressure for “sticky” features, re-engagement campaigns. Risk of “dark patterns” making cancellation hard.
• Examples: Some meal kits like Blue Apron (early years) faced high churn/acquisition costs.⁹⁹

Fraudulent or Fundamentally Deceptive Business Models:

• Characteristics: Business built on lies, misrepresentation, non-functional tech.
• Impact: Extreme pressure to create facade of legitimacy. Severe ethical compromises, moral distress, potential legal/reputational damage.
• Examples: Theranos (claimed non-functional tech worked).²⁵

High-Intensity / Toxic Cultures (Often Symptom of Above):

• Characteristics: Extreme pace, results-focus over process/well-being, unrealistic deadlines, high expectations, poor work-life balance, lack of transparency, blame culture.¹²
• Impact: Chronic stress, burnout, reduced creativity, fear of failure, negative health impacts.

The “trouble” often comes from misalignment: stated user value vs. actual business drivers. Designers aim for user value, but the model might prioritize conflicting goals (VC growth metrics, ad impressions over UX, aggressive subscription lock-in). In “growth-at-all-costs” ⁶⁴, designers might be pushed towards aggressive onboarding prioritizing data collection over good first impressions. In ad-driven models (Buzzfeed ⁸¹), design might prioritize ad visibility over readability.

These models create uncertainty and ambiguity. Unclear profitability path or volatile markets lead to reactive product development. Companies reliant on fluctuating platform traffic (Buzzfeed, Vice ⁸²) are vulnerable to external shocks like algorithm changes.⁸⁶ This forces sudden strategy shifts. Design teams face constant reprioritization, discarded work, redirection, leading to demoralization. No stable anchor for long-term design.

Due Diligence: How Can Product Designers Evaluate a Business Model During the Interview Process?

Understanding Business Model/Revenue:

• “Explain the primary revenue streams and overall business model simply.” ⁷ (Gauges clarity/coherence).
• “What are the key success metrics, and how does product/design contribute?” ³⁵ (Reveals values, perceived design impact).
• “What’s the financial position and path to profitability (especially if VC-funded)?” ⁴⁷ (Response nature is telling).
• “Who are main competitors, and what are key differentiators?” ³⁶ (Assesses market awareness).

Probing Product Strategy/Vision:

• “What’s the long-term vision for the product and company?” ¹⁰³ (Understands ambition/direction).
• “How are strategic product decisions made? What’s design’s role/influence?” ³⁵ (Clarifies design’s strategic position).
• “How are new ideas/features validated before committing resources?” ⁴⁵ (Indicates commitment to de-risking).

Inquiring About Culture, Team Dynamics, Challenges:

• “How does the culture support learning from failures?” ¹⁰³ (Uncovers attitudes to risk/iteration).
• “How is user feedback collected, analyzed, incorporated?” ³⁵ (Gauges user-centricity).
• “What are the biggest challenges the design team/company faces? How are they addressed?” ¹⁰³ (Reveals pain points).
• “What does success look like for this role/design team in the first year?” ⁶³ (Clarifies expectations).

Observing Interviewer Responses and Subtle Cues:

• Clarity, Confidence, Consistency: Are answers clear, confident, consistent? Or vague, evasive, jargon-filled, contradictory? ⁶² Evasiveness on financials/strategy is a red flag.
• Openness About Challenges: Do they discuss challenges/setbacks honestly? Or only paint a rosy picture? ⁶⁹ Openness suggests learning culture.
• Genuine Enthusiasm: Is there real excitement about the product/mission/future? Lack of it is telling.
• Work Environment Descriptions: How do they describe pace, work-life balance, collaboration? Listen for pressure/support clues.⁶²
• Valuation of Design: Do their responses/questions show design is valued strategically, not just executionally?

Conducting Research Before/After Interviews:

• Company News: Look for press releases, funding news, launches, leadership changes, layoffs, regulatory issues.
• Third-Party Review Sites: Glassdoor, Comparably offer insights on culture, leadership, outlook. Read critically for patterns, be mindful of bias.¹⁴
• Industry/Competitor Analysis: Understand industry health, competitor strength, market trends impacting viability.
• Financial Indicators (Public/Funded): Basic understanding of revenue growth, profitability/loss, cash burn provides context.⁴⁷

Table 2: Designer’s Due Diligence Checklist: Assessing Business Model Health in Interviews

Area of Inquiry	Key Questions to Ask	Positive Signs (Green Flags)	Warning Signs (Red Flags)
Revenue Model & Financials	How does the company make money? Path to profitability? Key financial metrics?	Clear, sustainable revenue streams; realistic path to profit; transparent about metrics.	Vague answers; over-reliance on future funding; constantly shifting monetization strategy; unwillingness to discuss.
Product Strategy & Vision	Long-term product vision? How are strategic decisions made? Role of design in strategy? How are ideas validated?	Clear, compelling vision; design has a strategic voice; robust validation processes.	Short-term focus; reactive decisions; design is purely executional; little evidence of user research informing strategy.
Market & Competition	Main competitors? Key differentiators? Market understanding?	Realistic assessment of competition; clear unique selling proposition; deep market understanding.	Dismissive of competition; unclear differentiation; superficial market knowledge.
Company Culture & Leadership	How are failures handled? How is feedback incorporated? Work pace? Leadership style? Design team dynamics?	Learning culture; values user feedback; sustainable pace; supportive leadership; collaborative design team.	Blame culture; feedback ignored; constant fire-drills; micromanagement or absent leadership; siloed or demoralized team.
Growth & Stability	Growth plans? Employee turnover? Recent organizational changes (e.g., layoffs)?	Realistic growth plans; low/healthy turnover; stable organization or transparent communication about necessary changes.	Unrealistic “hockey stick” projections without substance; high turnover; frequent unexplained restructurings; hidden layoffs.

How Can Product Designers Frame Their Experience and Build a Strong Portfolio After Working on a Failed Product?

Product failure or company collapse is tough, but not a career end. Strategic framing, focusing on process and learnings, and building a narrative can turn challenges into assets, showcasing resilience, adaptability, and insights.

Portfolio Strategies for Failed Products/Companies:

Shift focus from market outcome to design process quality, contributions, and learnings.

Emphasize “Why” and Process, Not Just “What”:

• Articulate the problem, project goals, and detailed design process (research, ideation, prototyping, testing).¹¹⁹
• Show the journey with artifacts (sketches, flows, wireframes, research summaries, test insights, prototypes). Demonstrates rigor even if product failed.¹²¹

Highlight Learnings, Iterations, Adaptations:

• Discuss learnings from research/testing, even if challenging or conflicting with assumptions.
• Detail design iterations based on feedback, data, or changing constraints.¹¹⁹
• Reflect critically: what could be done differently? What insights gained? Shows self-awareness, critical thinking, growth commitment.¹¹⁹

Quantify Impact Where Possible:

• Even in failure, small wins might exist. Did a redesign improve a metric? Did testing reveal critical flaws? Did team streamline a process?.¹²¹

Address Failure Concisely and Professionally:

• Acknowledge failure briefly/professionally. Example: “Product aimed to solve X. Showed promise in testing [cite positives], but company faced broader market/funding/strategic challenges leading to discontinuation.”
• Pivot narrative to your role, contributions, challenges navigated, lessons learned. Avoid negativity/blame. Maintain constructive tone.

Showcase Transferable Skills:

• Highlight core skills: problem-solving, user empathy, research, UX/UI proficiency, prototyping, collaboration, communication, adaptability under pressure. Ensure these are evident.

Structure Narrative (e.g., STAR Method):

• Situation: Set scene: company, product goal, core challenge (e.g., “Early-stage startup in X market, untested model. Challenge: sustainable acquisition amid competition, limited funding.”)
• Task: Define your responsibilities/design objectives (e.g., “Lead UX for onboarding flow, features for initial engagement.”)
• Action: Detail design process: research, hypotheses, solutions, prototypes, testing. Describe challenges (shifting requirements, resource limits from flawed model) and how you adapted/advocated.¹¹⁹
• Result: Focus on your design work results and learnings. Insights generated? Measurable improvements from your interventions? Key lessons learned about design/strategy/users? How did this make you better?.¹¹⁹

Interview Narrative Strategies:

Honesty, focus on learning, positive framing.

• Be Honest but Constructive: Acknowledge failure directly, avoid negativity/blame. Focus on learnings and professional growth.
• Emphasize Resilience, Adaptability, Problem-Solving: Highlight navigating uncertainty, shifting priorities, producing quality work despite constraints. These are valued soft skills.
• Focus on Your Specific Contributions: Articulate your responsibilities and achievements, separate from company fate.
• Connect Learnings to New Role: Explain how the experience provided valuable skills/insights for the new opportunity (e.g., “Learned lean UX, ruthless prioritization, valuable for this role”).¹¹⁶

Understand Recruiter Perspective:

• Many understand startup failures are common, not reflection on talent. Interested in handling adversity, learning, problem-solving.³⁵
• Failed startup experience can signal initiative, risk-taking, business-building exposure.¹¹⁸
• Be ready to discuss business context, model flaws insights, design decisions made (or should have been) given business goals.³⁵

Distinguish company outcome from your individual process, contributions, learnings. Case study shows your work quality, problem-solving, growth, regardless of business destiny.¹²⁰ Clearly delineate “this was the business failure” from “this was my design approach in that context, and this is what I learned.” Turns potential negative into story of growth/resilience.

Conclusion: It Sucks

Here’s the reality: Most companies are bad places to work. For lots of reasons. Even doing due dilligence won’t always save you, because some folks will flat-out lie to you during the interview process.

But the value of understanding the business models of a company is that you will no longer blame yourself if things go wrong. Designers tend to be people pleasers, which is a big reason why they get targeted first when things go wrong — they are least likely to fight back. Understanding these business concepts will help you retain your self-worth and give you the courage to set boundaries when necessary.

Bibliography (Click to show)

1. Business Strategy vs. Product Strategy: What’s the Difference?, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.productplan.com/learn/business-strategy-vs-product-strategy/
2. The Rise and Fall: Is Gorillas Business Model Unsustainable?, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.apptunix.com/blog/what-went-wrong-gorillas-business-model/
3. How Micromobility Brand Bird Grew So Fast | Latana, accessed May 6, 2025, https://resources.latana.com/post/bird-mobility-brand-deep-dive/
4. ‘Bird’ Sees Overstated Revenue for Two Years by Recognizing …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.techtimes.com/articles/283390/20221114/bird-sees-overstated-revenue-two-years-recognizing-unpaid-customer-rides.htm
5. eprints.whiterose.ac.uk, accessed May 6, 2025, https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/149377/3/JAMS-D-18-00494R2%20-%20edited.pdf
6. Cincinnati Financial Corporation Holds Shareholders’ and Directors’ Meetings – PR Newswire, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cincinnati-financial-corporation-holds-shareholders-and-directors-meetings-302445947.html
7. The business model in product design. What do you need to know? – The Story, accessed May 6, 2025, https://thestory.is/en/process/discovery-phase/business-model/
8. 5 Ways Workplace Culture Drives Business Profitability | Great Place …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.greatplacetowork.com/resources/blog/5-ways-workplace-culture-drives-business-profitability
9. Why is Company Culture Important? | Pollack Peacebuilding Systems, accessed May 6, 2025, https://pollackpeacebuilding.com/blog/importance-of-company-culture/
10. How Organizational Culture Influences Employee Behavior | Together Mentoring Software, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.togetherplatform.com/blog/how-organizational-culture-influences-employee-behavior
11. How to Build — and Improve — Company Culture – Professional & Executive Development, accessed May 6, 2025, https://professional.dce.harvard.edu/blog/how-to-build-and-improve-company-culture/
12. Toxic Work Culture in the Tech Industry: Combating Toxicity [2023 …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.talentlms.com/research/toxic-culture-tech-industry-survey
13. How Toxic Workplace Environment Effects the Employee Engagement: The Mediating Role of Organizational Support and Employee Wellbeing – PMC, accessed May 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7956351/
14. not-at-all-steve.bsky.social: “After seeing the puff pieces about Klarna’s IPO I wondered if there were any sources of what it’s actually like inside that company. Glassdoor reviews give some insight – Bluesky, accessed May 6, 2025, https://bsky.app/profile/not-at-all-steve.bsky.social/post/3lijljqimjs2y
15. What’s up with Klarna? : r/cscareerquestionsEU – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestionsEU/comments/17htdt8/whats_up_with_klarna/
16. Anyone working at Klarna? : r/TillSverige – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/TillSverige/comments/yw2z5u/anyone_working_at_klarna/
17. Klarna CEO: Company stopped hiring because AI ‘can do all of the jobs’ | Hacker News, accessed May 6, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42432494
18. The roles Klarna is cutting down on as it lays off staff | Sifted, accessed May 6, 2025, https://sifted.eu/articles/klarna-layoffs-roles-cities-cuts
19. The 7 Critical Vital Signs of Organizational Health – Stewart …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://stewartleadership.com/the-7-critical-vital-signs-of-organizational-health/
20. Ethical design guide: principles, benefits and examples – Future Processing, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.future-processing.com/blog/ethical-design-principles-benefits-and-examples/
21. Ethics in UX Design: Adherence and Implications to Businesses | Ramotion Agency, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ramotion.com/blog/ethics-in-ux-design/
22. Impact of Ethical Leadership on Autonomy and Self-Efficacy in Virtual Work Environments: The Disintegrating Effect of an Egoistic Climate – MDPI, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/1/95
23. Interview with Felipe Sbravate, Product Designer at Klarna: Lovers Magazine by Spaces, accessed May 6, 2025, https://spaces.is/loversmagazine/interviews/felipe-sbravate
24. Klarna uses AI to save $10M on marketing annually while upping output, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.marketingdive.com/news/klarna-gen-ai-openai-cut-marketing-spend-efficiency/717332/
25. Theranos: A Fallen Unicorn – Investopedia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/020116/theranos-fallen-unicorn.asp
26. Elizabeth Holmes & the Theranos case: History of a fraud scandal, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.integrityline.com/expertise/blog/elizabeth-holmes-theranos/
27. The Hard Truth About Business Model Innovation, accessed May 6, 2025, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-hard-truth-about-business-model-innovation/
28. The failure of Juicero: A case study on over-engineering and pricing – Aithor, accessed May 6, 2025, https://aithor.com/essay-examples/the-failure-of-juicero-a-case-study-on-over-engineering-and-pricing
29. The Downfall of Juicero: The Overhyped High-Tech Juicer – Codemotion, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.codemotion.com/magazine/dev-life/stories/the-downfall-of-juicero-the-overhyped-high-tech-juicer/
30. What Are The Key Challenges That Juicero Faced When Starting Up – FasterCapital, accessed May 6, 2025, https://fastercapital.com/topics/what-are-the-key-challenges-that-juicero-faced-when-starting-up.html
31. Business Strategy vs Product Strategy: Key Differences – Dotwork, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.dotwork.com/post/business-strategy-vs-product-strategy-key-differences
32. Case Study: The Rise and Fall of Quibi and Lessons Learned, accessed May 6, 2025, https://smartwareadvisors.com/pages/case-study-the-rise-and-fall-of-quibi-and-lessons-learned
33. The Psychology Behind Quibi’s $2B Fail – Choice Hacking, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.choicehacking.com/2024/01/03/the-psychology-behind-quibis-2b-fail/
34. Top 10 Challenges in the Product Design Process in 2024 – Devomech Solutions, accessed May 6, 2025, https://devomech.com/top-10-product-design-challenges-and-ways-to-overcome-them-in-2024/
35. Rubric for Product Design Interviews – Exponent, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.tryexponent.com/courses/pm-product-design/product-design-rubric
36. Competitive Analysis Guide for Product Designers – GrowthJockey, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.growthjockey.com/blogs/product-designer-understand-competitive-analysis
37. The Importance of Good Design in Business | Prometteur Solutions, accessed May 6, 2025, https://prometteursolutions.com/blog/the-importance-of-good-design-in-business/
38. The Direct Correlation Between Good Design And Business Growth, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2018/01/19/the-direct-correlation-between-good-design-and-business-growth/
39. Why Small Business Owners Need to Start Taking Design More Seriously – SCORE, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.score.org/resource/blog-post/why-small-business-owners-need-start-taking-design-more-seriously
40. Great marketing can’t save a bad product or business model, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.everything.design/blog/marketing-cant-save-bad-product-business-model
41. Why Some Products Fail: Avoid These Costly Product Design Mistakes – AAC Cyroma, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.aaccyroma.co.uk/common-product-design-mistakes/
42. Is It Time to Rethink the Architecture Firm Business Model? – Part3, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.part3.io/blog/rethink-architect-firm-business-model
43. Making Business Models Sustainable – Cutter Consortium, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.cutter.com/article/making-business-models-sustainable
44. Sustainable Business Model Patterns | Business Design Knowledge Base, accessed May 6, 2025, https://businessdesign.org/knowledge-base/sustainable-business-patterns
45. How to Build the Right Product: Business Design Fundamentals – Netguru, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.netguru.com/blog/how-to-build-right-product-business-design-fundamentals
46. Lessons Learned from Failed Startups: What Not to Do – Under30CEO, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.under30ceo.com/failed-startups/
47. What Is the Best Measure of a Company’s Financial Health?, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/061916/what-best-measure-companys-financial-health.asp
48. Culture at HelloFresh, accessed May 6, 2025, https://careers.hellofresh.com/global/en/lifeathellofresh
49. An Ethical Toolkit for Engineering/Design Practice – Santa Clara University, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.scu.edu/ethics-in-technology-practice/ethical-toolkit/
50. Ethics by Design: An organizational approach to responsible use of technology – World Economic Forum, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Ethics_by_Design_2020.pdf
51. Venturing green: the impact of sustainable business model innovation on corporate environmental performance in social enterprises | Emerald Insight, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/mrr-07-2024-0534/full/html
52. GROWTH BY DESIGN: HOW GOOD DESIGN DRIVES COMPANY …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/growth-by-design-how-good-design-drives-company-growth/
53. The power of organizational health | McKinsey, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/organizational-health-is-still-the-key-to-long-term-performance
54. Defining Healthy Organizational Culture – Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.scu.edu/ethics/culture-assessment-practice/defining-healthy-organizational-culture/
55. The Business Case for a Healthy Workplace, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.uml.edu/docs/fd_business_case_healthy_workplace_tcm18-42671.pdf
56. www.hbs.edu, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.hbs.edu/managing-the-future-of-work/Documents/research/Building%20From%20The%20Bottom%20Up.pdf
57. (PDF) Business Models for Sustainability – ResearchGate, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367023438_Business_models_for_Sustainability
58. What Is Sustainability in Business? – IBM, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/business-sustainability
59. Planet Positive Business – Design Council, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-mission/planet-positive-business/
60. Six Strategies to Lead Product Sustainability Design | BCG – Boston Consulting Group, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/six-strategies-to-lead-product-sustainability-design
61. Sustainable business model innovation: A brief overview – Schneider Electric Blog, accessed May 6, 2025, https://blog.se.com/sustainability/2022/05/16/sustainable-business-model-innovation-a-brief-overview/
62. 10 Job Search Red Flags To Look Out For | FlexJobs, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/job-search-warning-signs
63. 8 Signs of a Bad Company to Work for | TopResume, accessed May 6, 2025, https://ca.topresume.com/career-advice/8-signs-the-company-youre-interviewing-with-is-a-bad-place-to-work
64. Challenging the ‘Growth at all Costs’ Startup Model – SKMurphy, Inc., accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2024/08/21/challenging-the-growth-at-all-costs-startup-model/
65. How Tech Companies Can Minimize International Scaling Risks, accessed May 6, 2025, https://mexicobusiness.news/tech/news/how-tech-companies-can-minimize-international-scaling-risks
66. Blitzscaling – Aaron Abraham, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.aaronabraham.ca/books/Blitzscaling
67. High Intensity Culture: Is It The Best Corporate Culture? | Pierpoint, accessed May 6, 2025, https://pierpoint.com/blog/high-instensity-culture/
68. Understanding the Advantages and Disadvantages of Venture Capital for Startups, accessed May 6, 2025, https://visible.vc/blog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-venture-capital/
69. Top things job seekers see as red flags | Beacon Hill, accessed May 6, 2025, https://bhsg.com/resources/top-things-job-seekers-see-as-red-flags
70. Business Model Innovation: The Role of Industry Evolution and Competitive Pressure, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370768822_Business_model_innovation_The_role_of_industry_evolution_and_competitive_pressure
71. The Impact of Venture Capital on Startup Growth – Marquee Equity, accessed May 6, 2025, https://marquee-equity.com/blog/the-impact-of-venture-capital-on-startup-growth/
72. Enhancing the Innovative Capacity of Venture Capital – Yale Journal of Law & Technology, accessed May 6, 2025, https://yjolt.org/sites/default/files/5_-_lee_-_enhancing_the_innovative_capacity_of_venture_capital.pdf
73. RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT IN VENTURE CAPITAL, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=15607
74. 90% Startups Fail: Lesson from Businesses That Failed, accessed May 6, 2025, https://tsttechnology.io/blog/lesson-from-businesses-that-failed
75. Bolt’s Conscious Culture: Culture Playbook, accessed May 6, 2025, https://conscious.org/bolts-conscious-culture-culture-playbook/
76. Bolt Inc Culture | Comparably, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.comparably.com/companies/bolt-inc
77. Discovering the Vibrant Work Culture at HelloFresh US | HelloFresh, accessed May 6, 2025, https://careers.hellofresh.com/global/en/blogarticle/discovering-the-vibrant-work-culture-at-hellofresh-us
78. HelloFresh culture and work-life balance : r/cscareerquestionsEU – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestionsEU/comments/1ap5i2g/hellofresh_culture_and_worklife_balance/
79. How Does Venture Capital Shape Biotech Innovation? – ProMarket, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.promarket.org/2025/04/25/how-does-venture-capital-shapes-biotech-innovation/
80. Types of Work Environments: Examples & Role for Workplace – UnSpot, accessed May 6, 2025, https://unspot.com/blog/work-environment-types-and-examples/
81. What is Buzzfeed’s business model? – Vizologi, accessed May 6, 2025, https://vizologi.com/business-strategy-canvas/buzzfeed-business-model-canvas/
82. The Vice Media Collapse Was Entirely The Fault Of Incompetent, Fail-Upward Brunchlords, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.techdirt.com/2024/02/27/the-vice-media-collapse-was-entirely-the-fault-of-incompetent-fail-upward-brunchlords/
83. Vice’s pivot to studio model is ‘big loss for media’ – The Media Leader, accessed May 6, 2025, https://uk.themedialeader.com/vices-pivot-to-studio-model-is-big-loss-for-media/
84. What is Vice Media’s business model? – Vizologi, accessed May 6, 2025, https://vizologi.com/business-strategy-canvas/vice-media-business-model-canvas/
85. BuzzFeed – Wikipedia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuzzFeed
86. Dented by layoffs, BuzzFeed charts a path to a sustainable business – Digiday, accessed May 6, 2025, https://digiday.com/media/dented-layoffs-buzzfeed-charts-path-sustainable-business/
87. BuzzFeed’s restructure puts focus on commerce & brand partnerships – but at what cost?, accessed May 6, 2025, https://econsultancy.com/buzzfeed-restructuring-commerce-brand-partnerships/
88. ILO Yellow Report “Realizing Decent Work in the Platform Economy” – Focus on Care and Domestic Platforms – International Trade Union Confederation, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ituc-csi.org/ilo-yellow-report-platform-economy
89. Next-Generation Business Models A Guide to Digital Marketplaces – World Economic Forum, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Marketplaces_guidebook_2021.pdf
90. How online marketplaces are transforming traditional services models | Deloitte Australia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/au/en/services/consulting/perspectives/how-online-marketplaces-transforming-traditional-services-models.html
91. What challenges do product managers face while building online marketplaces? – Quora, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-challenges-do-product-managers-face-while-building-online-marketplaces
92. Four Challenges of Platform Teams: Insights from ThoughtWorks Experts – DASA, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.dasa.org/blog/four-challenges-of-platform-teams-insights-from-thoughtworks-experts/
93. 12 Common marketing team challenges and how to avoid them – Formaloo, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.formaloo.com/blog/12-common-marketing-team-challenges-and-how-to-avoid-them
94. Subscription models: Churn Reduction Tactics: Keeping Subscribers Engaged in Your Business – FasterCapital, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.fastercapital.com/content/Subscription-models–Churn-Reduction-Tactics–Keeping-Subscribers-Engaged-in-Your-Business.html
95. How Subscription Business Models Provide Stability in Recession? – MemberPoint, accessed May 6, 2025, https://memberpoint.io/how-subscription-business-models-provide-stability-in-recession/
96. Churn analysis 101: A how-to guide for businesses – Stripe, accessed May 6, 2025, https://stripe.com/resources/more/churn-analysis-101-a-how-to-guide-for-businesses
97. Churn management 101: A tactical guide for businesses – Stripe, accessed May 6, 2025, https://stripe.com/resources/more/churn-management-101-a-tactical-guide-for-businesses
98. The Subscription Economy Paradox: Why Most Brands Fail at Subscription Models and How to Avoid It – SocialChamps, accessed May 6, 2025, https://socialchamps.com/the-subscription-economy-paradox-why-most-brands-fail-at-subscription-models-and-how-to-avoid-it/
99. Do Meal Kit Services Belong To The Sustainability Movement? | The …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.themomentum.com/story-a/do-meal-kit-services-belong-to-the-sustainability-movement
100. Blue Apron Marketing Strategy – VoyMedia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://voymedia.com/blue-apron-marketing-strategy/
101. The Story of Blue Apron and How it Overcame Problems – Marketing Maverick, accessed May 6, 2025, https://marketingmaverick.io/p/the-story-of-blue-apron-and-how-it-overcame-problems
102. Effective Branding Strategy – Blue Apron – Hummingbird Creative Group, accessed May 6, 2025, https://hummingbird-creative.com/how-blue-apron-rose-fell-and-rose-again-with-effective-brand-strategy/
103. Product Design Lead, what’s the best question you’ve ever been …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/UXDesign/comments/1ir8fbl/product_design_lead_whats_the_best_question_youve/
104. How Healthy is Your Design Business? Three Financial Indicators to …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://cvwaccountinginc.com/how-healthy-is-your-design-business-three-financial-indicators-to-future-proof-your-business/
105. Top 10 Must-Ask Design Interview Questions – Aquent, accessed May 6, 2025, https://aquenttalent.com/blog/top-10-must-ask-design-interview-questions
106. How to Design an Effective (and Efficient) Interview Process – Underscore VC, accessed May 6, 2025, https://underscore.vc/resources/design-an-effective-interview-process/
107. The impact scandal has on your career – RealKM, accessed May 6, 2025, https://realkm.com/2018/02/15/the-impact-scandal-has-on-your-career/
108. Advance Your Product Design Career: Mid-level to Senior Role – The Quantic Blog, accessed May 6, 2025, https://quantic.edu/blog/2021/09/28/advance-your-product-design-career-mid-level-to-senior-role/
109. Ask HN: If my startup fails, what are the impacts on my future career prospects?, accessed May 6, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11931663
110. The Unspoken Truths of Startup Failures — 10 Cautionary Tales for Entrepreneurs, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.entrepreneur.com/starting-a-business/the-unspoken-truths-of-startup-failures-10-cautionary/485822
111. Designing at a failing startup (Advice please) : r/UXDesign – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/UXDesign/comments/1gus6un/designing_at_a_failing_startup_advice_please/
112. I Aim to Create Services That Make Daily Life Easier and Urban …, accessed May 6, 2025, http://smebusinessreview.com/public/profiles/profile/i-aim-to-create-services-that-make-daily-life-easier-and-urban-living-more-convenient-ka%C4%9Fan-s%C3%BCmer-ceo-gorillas
113. BuzzFeed migrates from Looker to Omni in less than three months …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://omni.co/blog/case-study-buzzfeed
114. Mission, Vision & Core Values of BuzzFeed – CanvasBusinessModel.com, accessed May 6, 2025, https://canvasbusinessmodel.com/blogs/mission/buzzfeed-mission
115. What BuzzFeed’s CEO really means about pivoting the business to be an AI media and tech company – Digiday, accessed May 6, 2025, https://digiday.com/media/what-buzzfeeds-ceo-really-means-about-pivoting-the-business-to-be-an-ai-media-and-tech-company/
116. Ask HN: Startup failed after years of work – Can I even get a job now? | Hacker News, accessed May 6, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19386758
117. The Top 10 Product Design Interview Questions (And Answers) – CareerFoundry, accessed May 6, 2025, https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/product-design/product-design-interview-questions/
118. The Evaluation of Founder Failure and Success by Hiring Firms: A Field Experiment | Organization Science – PubsOnLine, accessed May 6, 2025, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2022.1592
119. 90% of designers are unhirable? | Matej Latin, accessed May 6, 2025, https://matejlatin.com/blog/90-percent-of-designers-are-unhirable/
120. Guide to a Top-Notch Product Design Portfolio [+Tips and Examples] – Cake, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.cake.me/resources/product-design-portfolio
121. Do recruiters differentiate between UX/UI Designers and Product Designers? – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/UXDesign/comments/1iiszol/do_recruiters_differentiate_between_uxui/